Overview

California law sets clear limits on how HOAs may regulate pets. Under the Davis-Stirling Act, HOAs may adopt reasonable pet-related rules, but they may not impose restrictions that function as an outright ban. Civil Code 4715 anchors that framework and draws the line between lawful regulation and unlawful prohibition.

That line turns on how a rule operates, not how a board labels it. Rules addressing nuisance behavior, leash requirements, number of animals, or legitimate safety concerns can stand when boards apply them reasonably and consistently. By contrast, rules that block homeowners from keeping common household pets, or that require owners to give up pets they lawfully kept before a new rule took effect, cross the statutory boundary. When a restriction does not amount to an outright ban, closer questions arise, and factors such as the scope of a breed limitation, the presence or absence of a grandfathering provision, and the consistency of enforcement often decide whether the rule holds up.

Civil Code 4715 also defines what the statute means by “pet.” The law uses specific language and limits the term to common household animals, including dogs, cats, domesticated birds, aquatic animals kept within an aquarium, and any other animal the HOA and the homeowner agree to treat as a pet. That definition matters because boards sometimes stretch pet rules beyond what the statute permits or attempt to regulate animals the law treats differently.

Pet rules further intersect with federal and state disability-accommodation laws. For example, neither service animals nor emotional support animals count as ordinary pets under federal and California fair-housing law, and HOAs may not apply standard pet bans, fees, or size and breed limits to qualifying animals. At the same time, the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) generally does not govern HOA pet disputes at all unless an HOA opens its common area facilities to the public. This Fact Sheet explains where California law permits regulation, where HOA authority stops, and how homeowners can evaluate whether a pet restriction complies with the statute or invites challenge.

You might find the following short episode from my podcast, HOA HELL, helpful: “Can My HOA Ban Me From Having a Pet?”

Or, if you’d like to take a deeper dive into the laws surrounding service animals and emotional support animals, see my full article titled “Service Animals and Emotional Support Animals in California HOAs: Your Rights.”

Key Points

Civil Code 4715 limits what an HOA may do with pet restrictions in California. The statute allows an HOA to regulate pets through reasonable rules, but it does not allow an HOA to prohibit common household pets outright. The key is to separate lawful regulation from restrictions that function as a ban.

• Civil Code 4715 prohibits outright pet bans in California HOAs. The statute prevents an HOA from adopting or enforcing provisions that prohibit an owner from keeping at least one pet in the development, so long as the HOA’s pet rules remain reasonable.
• Civil Code 4715 defines what the law means by “pet,” and that definition controls enforcement. The statute defines a pet as a domesticated bird, cat, dog, aquatic animal kept within an aquarium, or another animal the HOA and the homeowner agree to treat as a pet. HOA boards cannot narrow or expand that definition through rules, policies, or informal interpretations.
• An HOA may regulate pets, but an HOA may not use regulation to accomplish a ban. An HOA may enforce reasonable rules addressing leash use, waste cleanup, noise, aggressive behavior, property damage, or legitimate nuisance conduct. An HOA crosses the line when the HOA board adopts or applies rules so restrictive that homeowners cannot realistically keep a protected pet.
• Breed restrictions require careful scrutiny and cannot operate as a proxy ban. An HOA board may adopt breed restrictions tied to credible safety or nuisance concerns, but the HOA board cannot target every large or commonly owned breed or rely on speculation, fear, or bias to justify exclusion. Scope, evidentiary support, and real-world impact determine whether a breed rule holds up.
• Civil Code 4715 protects homeowners from losing pets they lawfully kept before a new rule took effect. When a homeowner lawfully kept a pet before the HOA board adopted a new restriction, the statute can prevent the HOA from forcing the homeowner to surrender that pet based solely on the later rule.
• Civil Code 4715 focuses on the “owner,” which matters in rental situations. Because the statute speaks in terms of an owner’s rights, enforcement disputes involving tenants often require the owner to assert those rights directly when an HOA board targets a renter’s pet.
• Service animals and emotional support animals are not considered “pets” under fair-housing laws. Federal and California fair-housing laws require HOAs to grant reasonable accommodations for qualifying assistance animals, even when the HOA enforces strict pet rules. An HOA board may not impose pet deposits, pet rent, breed limits, or size restrictions on a qualifying assistance animal. If you want to read about the limits of HOA authority over service animals and emotional support animals, try any of the following Fact Sheets: “California HOAs and Assistance Animals: Access, Enforcement, and Protecting Your Rights,” “California HOAs and Service Animals: What Boards Can and Cannot Require,” or “California HOAs and Emotional Support Animals: Paperwork and Illegal Board Demands.”
• The ADA generally does not apply to HOA pet disputes unless the HOA opens facilities to the public. Most HOA common areas do not qualify as places of public accommodation. ADA service-animal rules typically apply only when an HOA board opens common area facilities to the general public, such as by renting a clubhouse or selling public access.
• Homeowners can evaluate the legality of a pet restriction before a dispute escalates. Homeowners should identify the exact CC&R or rule language their HOA relies on, confirm how and when their HOA adopted the restriction, compare enforcement across similarly situated homeowners, and assess whether the rule operates as regulation or as a de facto ban in violation of Civil Code 4715.
• Call MBK CHAPMAN, and we’ll set your HOA straight. When an HOA board enforces a pet restriction that functions as a ban, ignores statutory limits, or mishandles an assistance-animal request, call us at MBK CHAPMAN, and we’ll set your HOA straight.

Taken together, these points show why HOA pet disputes turn on statutory boundaries, not HOA board preference. Once homeowners anchor the analysis in Civil Code 4715’s limits, its definition of “pet,” and the separate fair-housing framework for service animals and emotional support animals, they can quickly determine whether the HOA’s position complies with the law or violates it.

FAQs

About MBK Chapman Fact Sheets

Homeowners searching for answers online will often come across articles that appear authoritative, but are actually written as search-engine marketing content rather than by an experienced HOA lawyer. These pieces tend to prioritize keyword density over clarity, accuracy, or legal context, which often leaves homeowners more confused than informed.

At MBK Chapman, our Fact Sheets are part of our HOA Law Library and are written by Michael Kushner, an HOA lawyer with decades of hands-on experience representing California homeowners. In fact, Michael Kushner is the HOA lawyer who pioneered the systems and strategies used by some of California’s most successful homeowner-side HOA law firms.

Each Fact Sheet is deliberately concise, statute-based, and designed as a quick-reference guide to help homeowners understand key HOA laws and enforcement rules at a glance.

AND DON’T FORGET TO TUNE INTO MY PODCAST, HOA HELL

YOU CAN ALSO ORDER MY GROUNDBREAKING BOOK

HOA HELL | California Homeowners’ Definitive Guide to Beating Bad HOAs

Amazon  |  Barnes & Noble