Overview

The Davis-Stirling Act requires board members to be members of their HOAs, and membership depends entirely on recorded ownership. Once escrow closes on the sale of a director’s property, that director is no longer a member of the HOA, and thus is no longer qualified to serve on the HOA’s board. Timing controls everything here. Directors who resign before escrow closes leave by resignation, but directors who wait until title transfers lose their seats to disqualification. HOAs create a real problem for themselves when they ignore that distinction, treat every one of these exits as a resignation, and rush to appoint whoever the sitting directors prefer.

The way a seat opens decides who gets to fill it. Directors disqualified by the completed sale of their homes neither resign nor die, so their departures fall outside the powers of appointment that most HOA boards have upon a director’s death or resignation. In such cases, the members fill the seat by election, and the sitting directors have no role.

Bad HOAs (or at least ignorant ones) exploit these openings to install allies who protect the sitting majority. In doing so, those HOA boards leave those appointments open to challenge, along with every vote the improper appointees cast. Homeowners who catch the maneuver early can put their HOAs on notice in writing and force the seats to a member election before the boards entrench their picks.

In this Fact Sheet, I explain why a resignation timed after the deed records has no legal effect, why those exits count as automatic disqualifications and not resignations, why disqualified directors who keep participating in meetings expose their HOAs to added risk, and how a board’s power of appointment is limited to death or resignation. I also explain what homeowners should do when their HOAs try to appoint their own replacements anyway.

Key Points

An HOA director has to be a member to serve, and the Davis-Stirling Act ties membership to recorded ownership. A director who sells and closes escrow loses the right to serve by operation of law. The disqualification itself is straightforward. HOAs get into trouble with what they do next, when they treat the opening as an ordinary resignation, appoint a hand-picked successor, and only later discover they never had the power to fill that seat at all.

• Only HOA members may serve on the board of directors. Civil Code 4160 defines a member as an owner of a separate interest, and the Davis-Stirling Act limits board service to members. Ownership turns on the recorded deed, so a director qualifies to serve right up until title transfers to the buyer. The instant escrow closes and the deed records, that director stops owning a separate interest, stops being a member, and ends any eligibility to serve. [You can read about who counts as an HOA member by reading my Fact Sheet, “Who Counts as an Owner for California HOA Voting and Board Rights?”]
  • A director who stops being a member is disqualified from continuing to serve, and that disqualification happens on its own. Civil Code 5105 disqualifies any director who ceases to be a member from continuing to serve on the HOA board. The statute doesn’t ask the HOA board to vote, doesn’t wait for a formal resignation, and doesn’t give the director a grace period. Once the deed records, the disqualification takes effect by operation of law, which means the seat opens automatically at the moment of transfer. Nobody on the HOA board has to lift a finger, and nobody on the HOA board can stop it.
• Timing decides whether a director leaves by resignation or by disqualification. A director who resigns before escrow closes gives up the seat while still a member, so that exit counts as a resignation. A director who holds the seat until title transfers, having never resigned, simply loses it to disqualification instead. The two paths look similar from the outside, but they trigger completely different rules for who fills the seat. A director who wants to control that outcome has to resign before the deed records, not after. And a board that wants to appoint a successor, therefore, needs to receive a resignation from the selling director before escrow closes on the sale of that director’s home.
  • A resignation letter sent after the deed records has no legal effect. A director who’s already disqualified has no seat left to resign, so a letter that’s sent after escrow closes is a courtesy and nothing more. The disqualification already emptied the seat under Civil Code 5105, and a late letter can’t reach back and convert that disqualification into a resignation. Bad HOAs sometimes seize on these after-the-fact letters and announce that the director resigned because a resignation lets the HOA board claim its appointment power. That relabeling doesn’t hold up, and homeowners shouldn’t let an HOA board rewrite a disqualification as a resignation just to justify appointing a successor of their choice.
• An HOA board’s power to appoint a replacement director depends entirely on what the bylaws say about vacancies. Corporations Code 7224 lets the remaining directors fill almost any vacancy, but only “unless otherwise provided in the articles or bylaws,” and it also lets the members elect a director to fill any vacancy the directors don’t fill. But when an HOA’s bylaws limit appointment to just the death or resignation of a director, as most do, then a seat that opens through disqualification is neither a death nor a resignation. In such a case, the director who lost membership through a completed sale neither died nor resigned, so the HOA board has no authority to appoint anyone to that seat. The result flips, however, when the bylaws grant broader authority to fill most vacancies under Corporations Code 7224. Homeowners should, therefore, read their bylaws before they assume the seat belongs to the members to fill. [If you’d like to read more about a board’s appointment powers, check out my Fact Sheet “Can My California HOA Avoid Elections and Just Appoint Board Members?”]
• A disqualified director who keeps attending meetings and voting after the sale acts without any authority, and the HOA can’t rely on a thing that director does. Sometimes an HOA doesn’t rush to fill the seat and instead lets the departed owner keep showing up, voting, and shaping decisions as if the sale never happened. That director lost all authority to act the moment the deed recorded, so every decision that turned on that participation becomes open to challenge, including any measure that passed only because of that director’s vote. The HOA gains nothing by pretending the seat’s still valid because those votes stay vulnerable for as long as anyone cares to contest them.
• Homeowners who catch an unlawful appointment should put the HOA board on notice in writing before the appointee settles in. The strongest first move is a written notice to the full HOA board stating that the seat opened by disqualification under Civil Code 5105, not by resignation, and that the bylaws authorize appointment only for a death or a resignation. That notice should demand that the HOA board rescind the appointment and that it send the seat to a member election under Corporations Code 7224.
• If your HOA appointed a replacement director to a seat that opened when a director sold, call the HOA attorneys at MBK Chapman. The homeowner-side HOA attorneys at MBK Chapman force HOAs throughout California to undo appointments they had no power to make and to send contested seats to the member election the law requires. If your HOA board is trying to pass off a disqualification as a resignation or quietly install an ally, contact us today.

A director who sells stops qualifying to serve the moment the deed records, and the seat opens by disqualification, not by resignation. That distinction controls who picks the next director. In an HOA whose bylaws allow appointment only for a death or a resignation, the sitting directors have no say, and the replacement goes to a vote of the members. A resignation letter that shows up after closing can’t change any of that, and an HOA board that treats a late letter as a resignation to justify its own appointment invites a challenge to both the appointment and every vote that follows it. Homeowners who read their bylaws, cite Civil Code 5105 and Corporations Code 7224, and act quickly can keep an ordinary home sale from handing their HOA board a director it was never entitled to choose.

FAQs

About Michael Kushner

Michael Kushner is a California attorney with over 30 years of experience representing homeowners in disputes with their HOAs. He is widely regarded as California’s leading homeowner-side HOA attorney, and has built one of the state’s most prominent law practices dedicated to holding HOAs accountable under the Davis-Stirling Act and California law.

In addition to his law firm’s work, Michael is a recognized lecturer, author, and the host of the hit HOA HELL podcast, where he provides homeowners living in HOA-governed communities with clear, practical strategies for dealing with bad HOAs. He’s also the author of the best-selling book, HOA HELL | California Homeowners’ Definitive Guide to Beating Bad HOAs, which has become a go-to resource for both homeowners seeking real-world solutions to their HOA disputes, as well as those good HOA board members who are interested in doing a good job.

About MBK Chapman Fact Sheets

Homeowners searching for answers online will often come across articles that appear authoritative, but are actually written as search-engine marketing content rather than by an experienced HOA lawyer. These pieces tend to prioritize keyword density over clarity, accuracy, or legal context, which often leaves homeowners more confused than informed.

At MBK Chapman, our Fact Sheets are part of our HOA Law Library and are written by Michael Kushner, an HOA lawyer with decades of hands-on experience representing California homeowners. In fact, Michael Kushner is the HOA lawyer who pioneered the systems and strategies used by some of California’s most successful homeowner-side HOA law firms.

Each Fact Sheet is deliberately concise, statute-based, and designed as a quick-reference guide to help homeowners understand key HOA laws and enforcement rules at a glance.

AND DON’T FORGET TO TUNE INTO MY PODCAST, HOA HELL

YOU CAN ALSO ORDER MY GROUNDBREAKING BOOK

HOA HELL | California Homeowners’ Definitive Guide to Beating Bad HOAs

Amazon  |  Barnes & Noble