Overview

Few records create more tension inside an HOA than the membership list. Access to that list allows homeowners to communicate with one another about governance, circulate information, organize reform efforts, and coordinate votes. For boards that prefer to operate without scrutiny, that transparency can feel threatening. That is why membership list disputes are common.

The Davis-Stirling Act addresses the issue directly. Civil Code 5200(a)(9) includes the membership list among the records homeowners have the right to inspect and copy. Civil Code 5220 allows individual members to opt out of sharing certain contact information. Read together, those provisions create a clear rule: homeowners have a right to inspect the membership list, subject only to narrow limitations. An HOA does not get to deny the list simply because it dislikes your purpose.

The real conflict arises around what the law calls “improper purpose.” An HOA may refuse to provide the membership list if it reasonably believes the requesting member seeks it for commercial solicitation, harassment, threats, or fraud. Boards sometimes attempt to stretch that concept beyond its intended scope. The outcome often turns on how clearly the homeowner articulates a legitimate purpose and how courts evaluate the HOA’s justification.

This Fact Sheet explains when an HOA may lawfully deny access to the membership list, how the opt-out provision actually works, what qualifies as an improper purpose, and what enforcement options exist if the denial crosses the line.

This Fact Sheet is the final installment in the Civil Code 5200 series. The other Fact Sheets in this series included:

• “Can I See My California HOA’s Records? A Homeowner’s Guide to Civil Code 5200” 
• “What HOA Documents Am I Legally Entitled to See in California?” 
• “How Do I Write a 5200 Demand Letter to My California HOA?” 
• “How Long Does My California HOA Have to Respond to a Records Request?” 
• “Can My HOA Withhold or Black Out Documents?” 
• “Can My HOA Charge Me for Copies of Records?”
• “What Do I Do If My California HOA Refuses to Give Me Records?”

Key Points

The membership list is not just another record category. It is a communication tool. That is why disputes over it are frequent and often aggressive. The Davis-Stirling Act protects access to the list, but it also places defined limits on how it may be used.

• The membership list is expressly included in Civil Code 5200. Civil Code 5200(a)(9) gives homeowners the right to inspect and copy the HOA’s membership list. That right is not discretionary. If you are a member of the association, you are entitled to request it.
• Individual members may opt out of sharing certain contact information. Civil Code 5220 allows members to opt out of sharing their name, property address, mailing address, and email address for purposes of third-party disclosure. An HOA must honor valid opt-out elections. The existence of opt-outs by other HOA members does not eliminate your right to the list. It simply limits the information that may be disclosed for those members who affirmatively opted out.
• An HOA may deny you access to the membership list if your purpose is improper. The Davis-Stirling Act allows denial if the HOA reasonably believes that you’re seeking the membership list for commercial solicitation purposes, harassment, threats, or fraud. Disliking your viewpoint, opposing a recall effort, or wanting to avoid harsh criticism does not qualify as an improper purpose.
  • Communicating about HOA governance is a legitimate purpose. Using the membership list to urge a petition to recall the board, discuss board decisions, circulate policy concerns, alert fellow members to illegal board conduct, or campaign in an election falls squarely within the “proper purpose” rights of membership. [Attempts by bad HOA boards and bad HOA managers to label governance-related communication as “harassment” are often tactical and easily challenged.]
• The HOA bears the burden of justifying a denial. If an HOA refuses to provide the membership list, it must articulate a concrete, fact-based reason tied to improper purpose. Conclusory statements that the request “raises concerns” or “may be misused” are insufficient.
• Partial disclosure based on opt-outs is lawful. An HOA may redact information for members who have validly opted out under Civil Code 5220. It may not, however, use the existence of some opt-outs as a basis to deny you access to the entire list.
• Timing rules still apply to the membership list. Civil Code 5210 requires production of the membership list within 5 business days of receipt of a proper request. Delay beyond that window without lawful justification constitutes noncompliance.
• Improper denial exposes the HOA to enforcement risk. If an HOA wrongfully denies access to the membership list, Civil Code 5235 allows a court to compel production and impose statutory penalties. Prevailing homeowners are also entitled to their attorneys’ fees.
• Call California’s most experienced HOA attorneys if your HOA denies you the membership list. Membership list disputes often escalate quickly because they implicate elections, recalls, and board control. If your HOA refuses to provide the list without lawful justification, call the expert HOA lawyers at MBK Chapman.

The membership list is not a favor granted by the board. It is a statutory right tied to membership itself. When bad HOA boards attempt to restrict that right beyond the limits set by the Davis-Stirling Act, they assume legal risk that many do not fully appreciate.

FAQs

About MBK Chapman Fact Sheets

Homeowners searching for answers online will often come across articles that appear authoritative, but are actually written as search-engine marketing content rather than by an experienced HOA lawyer. These pieces tend to prioritize keyword density over clarity, accuracy, or legal context, which often leaves homeowners more confused than informed.

At MBK Chapman, our Fact Sheets are part of our HOA Law Library and are written by Michael Kushner, an HOA lawyer with decades of hands-on experience representing California homeowners. In fact, Michael Kushner is the HOA lawyer who pioneered the systems and strategies used by some of California’s most successful homeowner-side HOA law firms.

Each Fact Sheet is deliberately concise, statute-based, and designed as a quick-reference guide to help homeowners understand key HOA laws and enforcement rules at a glance.

AND DON’T FORGET TO TUNE INTO MY PODCAST, HOA HELL

YOU CAN ALSO ORDER MY GROUNDBREAKING BOOK

HOA HELL | California Homeowners’ Definitive Guide to Beating Bad HOAs

Amazon  |  Barnes & Noble