IS YOUR HOA

MAKING YOUR LIFE A LIVING HELL?

CALIFORNIA’S #1 DAVIS-STIRLING ACT ATTORNEYS | HOMEOWNER REPRESENTATION

ORANGE COUNTY

TELL US ABOUT YOUR HOA DISPUTE

MBK Chapman can help

THE DAVIS-STIRLING ACT

The Davis-Stirling Act is a set of laws that govern all common interest developments located in California. (Civ. Code, §§ 4000-6150.). Since its passage in 1985, and through its most recent amendment, which went into effect on January 1, 2014, the Davis-Stirling Act acts as the primary rulebook that all common interest developments must follow.

Common interest developments in California take several forms, including (i) planned unit developments; (ii) community apartment projects; (iii) condominium projects; and (iv) stock co-ops.

Within the confines of those four types of developments, you’ll find all sorts of housing arrangements that you’re more familiar with, from detached homes (sometimes referred to as single-family houses), to condominiums, townhomes, and apartments located in tall buildings. But no matter what type of common interest development you might live in, it is governed by a board of directors known as an HOA (i.e., a homeowners association), and that HOA must operate within the confines of the Davis-Stirling Act.

You’re probably already keenly aware of how important a role your HOA plays in maintaining the value of your property and helping you enjoy your home. A good HOA can help keep your property value high; a bad HOA can force your property value to drop and otherwise turn your life upside down. A good HOA is invaluable; a bad HOA is typically a nightmare for its members.

MBK Chapman’s attorneys are experts in representing clients in cases involving the Davis-Stirling Act, representing homeowners throughout the State of California in all manner of disputes involving their HOAs (and neighbors), including:

FAILURE TO REPAIR / FAILURE TO MAINTAIN

In almost all cases, HOAs are required by their CC&Rs to inspect, maintain, and preserve the association’s common areas. (Civ. Code, § 4775; see also Civ. Code, §5550.) Those are, in fact, among an HOA’s most fundamental duties.

If an HOA neglects those duties by, say, refusing to make necessary repairs to a shared condominium roof, then that HOA is in violation of the Davis-Stirling Act, and thus not only can a member of the HOA force the association to make the repairs, but that same member can hold the HOA liable for any damages the owner suffers as a result of the HOA’s unreasonable delay or refusal to make the necessary repairs.

In short, your HOA might be liable to you for violating the Davis-Stirling Act if it:

  • refuses to fix (or delayed in fixing) a known leak on your condominium’s roof that later results in water damage to your property;
  • ignores structural damage to a common area building that threatens to cause even greater damage down the road;
  • neglects to make repairs to your community’s pool and spa, thus robbing you and the other members of its use during the hot summer months; or
  • fails to slurry your association’s roads, resulting in potholes that damage your car.

Contact Us to Discuss Your HOA Dispute By Calling: (949) 767-3910

VIOLATIONS OF THE CC&Rs AND OTHER GOVERNING DOCUMENTS

Your HOA’s governing documents are made up of not only the CC&Rs, but also your association’s bylaws, rules, and architectural guidelines. (Civ. Code, § 4150.) The CC&Rs, however, are the most important. An HOA’s CC&Rs are recorded with the county recorder’s office and they constitute the rulebook for you and your HOA, spelling out the rights and obligations that its members owe to the association, and vice versa. Your CC&Rs are, therefore, treated by law as a binding contract that addresses many very important issues, including: (i) the power and authority of the board of directors; (ii) what homeowners may do and not do with their properties; (iii) the association’s and homeowners’ mutual maintenance obligations; (iv) regular and special assessments; (v) lien rights and limitations; and (vi) the day-to-day management of the HOA. (Pinnacle Museum Tower Assn. v. Pinnacle Market Development (2012) 55 Cal.4th 223.)

Even though your HOA’s board of directors enjoys many of the same powers and responsibilities as any corporation’s board, your HOA’s board is made up of volunteers who often have no experience running a business, and certainly no experience with the Davis-Stirling Act. Problems arise when board members either fail to do their jobs, or they act arbitrarily, dishonestly, or capriciously. Typical CC&R violations by HOAs include things like:

  • failing to preserve, maintain, or repair the association’s common areas;
  • failing to address another owner’s nuisance behavior;
  • failing to enforce the HOA’s governing documents, especially when such failure is negatively affecting the rights of another HOA member;
  • failing to properly manage or account for the HOA’s finances;
  • failing to follow the election requirements contained in the Davis-Stirling Act; and
  • harassing certain members or treating some HOA members differently than others.

Contact Us to Discuss Your HOA Dispute By Calling:(949) 767-3910

DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT

HOAs must abide by the same antidiscrimination and antiharassment laws/regulations that all businesses and associations do. This means that HOAs are not permitted to violate the Fair Employment and Housing Act, the Americans with Disability Act (but only as to the common areas), the Fair Housing Act, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and most importantly, the Davis-Stirling Act. These laws, and others, of course, not only prohibit discrimination and harassment on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, disability, etc., but they also require HOAs to make reasonable accommodations to people with disabilities.

Many older HOAs had overtly discriminatory racial quotas in their CC&Rs. And while most of those CC&Rs have since been updated to remove such language, that does not mean that HOAs don’t regularly violate antidiscrimination laws. Many HOAs still engage in conduct that violate rights of its members and residents by, for example:

  • refusing to permit a disabled resident from building a ramp (violates reasonable accommodation regulations; see Civ. Code, § 4760);
  • prohibiting a resident from displaying a political banner on the resident’s property (violates Civ. Code, § 4710);
  • refusing outright to permit a resident from having a service or comfort animal (violates reasonable accommodation requirements; might also violate other statutes, such as Civ. Code, § 4715);
  • barring a resident from operating a daycare center in their home (Health & Safety Code § 1597.40);
  • barring domestic partners from enjoying membership rights (Koebke v. Bernardo Heights Country Club (2005) 36 Cal.4th 824; and
  • controlling occupancy by redefining the term “family” from its legal definition (City of Chula Vista v. Pagard (1981) 115 Cal.App.3d 785).

Contact Us to Discuss Your HOA Dispute By Calling: (949) 767-3910

DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBORS

For the vast majority of people who live in communities governed by an HOA, they live in close proximity to other people. In short, most people have neighbors. “Neighbor disputes” do, therefore, form the basis of many disputes between homeowners and their HOAs (and neighbors). Some of the more common claims that give rise to liability against a neighbor, and in many cases the HOA as well, occur when your neighbor is guilty of:

  • building an unnecessarily high fence right next to your property line—i.e., a spite fence (Civ. Code, § 841.4);
  • allowing branches or leaves from their trees to either cause damage to, or land on, your property (see Bonde v. Bishop (1952) 112 Cal.App. 2d 1);
  • allowing roots from their trees to damage your property;
  • trespassing onto your property—either directly by walking onto your property, or indirectly, such as by allowing water to spread onto, or under, your property (Cassinos v. Union Oil Co. (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 1770, 1778);
  • participating in illegal activities (e.g., drug dealing, non-permitted activities, etc.) (Civ. Code, §3479); or
  • causing excessive noise—or for that matter, engaging in any other activities that interfere with your reasonable use and quiet enjoyment of your property (Adams v. MHC Colony Park, L.P. (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 601, 610; Monks v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 263, 302-303).

Contact Us to Discuss Your HOA Dispute by Calling: (949) 767-3910

COMMON AREA DISPUTES

Simply put, your HOA’s common areas refer to areas that are owned by the HOA (rather than by any particular member(s) of the HOA). (Civ. Code, §4095.) While many HOAs have in common certain typical kinds of common areas, such as greenbelts/landscaping, sidewalks/walkways, swimming pools, and tennis courts, the other types of common areas you’re likely to see in an HOA have more to do with the type of association you joined. For example, in typical stacked structure communities (e.g., condominiums and townhomes), where the HOAs typically own everything but the air space in the individual units, the common areas you tend to find include things like roofs, hallways and staircases, parking lots/carports, HVAC systems, buildings, and plumbing/electrical. In communities consisting of single-family homes and/or planned unit developments (PUDs), on the other hand, you’ll often find streets, private gates, clubhouses, golf courses, equestrian facilities, and perimeter walls.

Regardless, because an association’s common areas are considered amenities by the members, and because they are often very expensive to construct and maintain, frequent common area-related disputes between homeowners and their HOAs arise regarding things like an HOAs:

  • failing to make necessary repairs to the common areas;
  • failing to reasonably maintain the common areas;
  • neglecting a member’s damage to or destruction of the common areas;
  • neglecting to take action against a member who has taken exclusive control over a portion of a common area;
  • facilitating the transfer of some portion of the common area to a member without membership approval; or
  • allowing the destruction of a portion of the common area.

Contact Us to Discuss Your HOA Dispute By Calling: (949) 767-3910

SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT / PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT

The Davis-Stirling Act imposes on your HOA a duty to enforce the CC&Rs in a manner that is not arbitrary or capricious, as well as by “procedures which are uniformly applied.” (Liebler v. Point Loma Tennis Club (1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 1600, 1609 citing Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 361, 383.) In other words, HOAs cannot show preferential treatment.

Unfortunately, human nature being what it is, homeowners frequently find that the board members of their HOAs “serve” because they enjoy the power that being on the board gives them, or they like to tell people what to do. These people are the ones who treat their HOAs like their own personal fiefdoms, often granting themselves and their friends privileges that they deny to other members. Such selective enforcement is illegal.

You may have a claim against your HOA for selective enforcement if your HOA:

  • allows a board member to enjoy a perk or privilege denied to other similarly situated members;
  • denies your application for an improvement to your home after having already approved applications from other similarly situated members;
  • strictly enforces certain rules against you while ignoring similar violations of other members; or
  • arbitrarily enforces certain rules while ignoring others.

Contact Us to Discuss Your HOA Dispute By Calling: (949) 691-3317

NEGLIGENCE BY YOUR HOA / NEIGHBOR

In simple terms, negligence is the failure to act reasonably in a given situation. If your HOA and/or neighbor cause damage to you or your property as a result of unreasonable conduct on their part(s), you may file a claim for negligence.

For example, you may have a strong negligence claim against your HOA/neighbor in any of the following types of situations:

  • your neighbor changes the grading on his or her property (with or without permission from the HOA) causing water to flow onto your property that in turn causes leaking and property damage;
  • your HOA fails to reasonably maintain the common areas, resulting in expensive replacements and repairs; or
  • you report a roof leak in your condominium building that the HOA either ignores or delays before taking action, causing damage to your property (see White v. Cox (1971) 17 Cal.App.3d 824, 895).

Contact Us to Discuss Your HOA Dispute By Calling: (949) 767-3910

WOULD YOU LIKE A FREE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATIONS?

THIS ESSENTIAL GUIDE CONTAINS VALUABLE INFORMATION ABOUT:

  • What an HOA is
  • Your Rights as a Homeowner and HOA Member
  • Detailed Answers to Frequently Asked Questions

15 + 1 =

TESTIMONIALS

I am so grateful for the representation from MBK Chapman. With one simple demand letter the problem was rectified. They are wonderful to have in your corner!

5 Star Review, Yelp, Posted by Martine L.

Michael Kushner is an amazing attorney! It is great to have such a savvy business attorney, whether creating contracts or analyzing vendor relationships, he is my go to!

5 Star Review, Yelp, Posted by Rosie S.

I am so grateful to Michael Kushner for defending me during my real estate nightmare, and recovering all my damages! He is brilliant!!

5 Star Review, Yelp, Posted by Christie D.

SOCIAL MEDIA

COMBINED YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

CASES LITIGATED

CONSULTATIONS

PRIORITY: YOU

OUR TEAM

Led by two pioneering and highly experienced litigation and business attorneys, MBK Chapman is staffed by some of the most impressive legal minds in the business. Leveraging decades of actual courtroom and transactional experience, clients who retain MBK Chapman quickly discover why the firm has earned such a stellar reputation for its innovation, staunch advocacy, and winning record. Whether aimed at negotiating and resolving highly complex business and real estate disputes, drafting all manner of complex business and real estate contracts, or going to court to litigate business and real estate cases, the battle-hardened lawyers at MBK Chapman are truly the best in the business.

Clients who retain MBK Chapman come to quickly understand why its two leaders are so well respected among the scores of judges, attorneys, and celebrities who have hired them over the last several decades. But MBK Chapman’s laudable contribution to the legal community does not end with its superstar team of lawyers and support staff. Rather, Michael B. Kushner, one of MBK Chapman’s founding shareholders, pioneered and developed two truly paradigm shifting and disruptive technologies that will, among other things, change the way lawyers interact with their clients.

Michael B. Kushner

Shareholder|California

William D. Chapman

Shareholder|California

Sean Mills

Shareholder|Florida

Jason Boss

Partner|California

Jessica Grazul

Associate|California

Sara Etemadi

Associate|California

Sam Khil

Associate|California

Xu Shirly Sun

Associate|California

Denetta E.J. Scott

Associate|California

Craig Koelling

Associate|Florida

CONTACT US

MBK Chapman PC can help

OFFICE

120 VANTIS DRIVE, SUITE 500
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656

MBK CHAPMAN PC

HEADQUARTERS
120 Vantis Dr., Suite 500
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656